the civilization of the renaissance in italy-第66节

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！


ven　French　and　Spanish　words　forbidden；　if　custom　has　once　　applied　them　to　definite　purposes。　Thus　care　and　intelligence　will　　produce　a　language；　which；　if　not　the　pure　old　Tuscan；　is　still　　Italian；　rich　in　flowers　and　fruit　like　a　well…kept　garden。　It　belongs　　to　the　completeness　of　the　'Cortigiano'　that　his　wit；　his　polished　　manners；　and　his　poetry；　must　be　clothed　in　this　perfect　dress。

When　style　and　language　had　once　become　the　property　of　a　living　　society；　all　the　efforts　of　purists　and　archaists　failed　to　secure　　their　end。　Tuscany　itself　was　rich　in　writers　and　the　first　order；　who　　ignored　and　ridiculed　these　endeavors。　Ridicule　in　abundance　awaited　　the　foreign　scholar　who　explained　to　the　Tuscans　how　little　they　　understood　their　language。　The　life　and　influence　of　a　writer　like　　Machiavelli　was　enough　to　sweep　away　all　these　cobwebs。　His　vigorous　　thoughts；　his　clear　and　simple　mode　of　expression　wore　a　form　which　had　　any　merit　but　that　of　the　'Trecentisti。'　And　on　the　other　hand　there　　were　too　many　North　Italians；　Romans；　and　Neapolitans；　who　were　　thankful　if　the　demand　for　purity　of　style　in　literature　and　　conversation　was　not　pressed　too　far。　They　repudiated；　indeed；　the　　forms　and　idioms　of　their　dialect；　and　Bandello；　with　what　a　foreigner　　might　suspect　to　be　false　modesty；　is　never　tired　of　declaring：　'I　have　　no　style；　I　do　not　write　like　a　Florentine；　but　like　a　barbarian；　I　am　　not　ambitious　of　giving　new　graces　to　my　language；　I　am　a　Lombard；　and　　from　the　Ligurian　border　into　the　bargain。'　But　the　claims　of　the　　purists　were　most　successfully　met　by　the　express　renunciation　of　the　　higher　qualities　of　style；　and　the　adoption　of　a　vigorous；　popular　　language　in　their　stead。　Few　could　hope　to　rival　Pietro　Bembo　who；　　though　born　in　Venice；　nevertheless　wrote　the　purest　Tuscan；　which　to　　him　was　a　foreign　language；　or　the　Neapolitan　Sannazaro；　who　did　the　　same。　But　the　essential　point　was　that　language；　whether　spoken　or　　written；　was　held　to　be　an　object　of　respect。　As　long　as　this　feeling　　was　prevalent；　the　fanaticism　of　the　puriststheir　linguistic　　congresses　and　the　rest　of　itdid　little　harm。　Their　bad　influence　was　　not　felt　till　much　later；　when　the　original　power　of　Italian　literature　　relaxed　and　yielded　to　other　and　far　worse　influences。　At　last　it　　became　possible　for　the　Accademia　della　Crusca　to　treat　Italian　like　a　　dead　language。　But　this　association　proved　so　helpless　that　it　could　　not　even　hinder　the　invasion　of　Gallicism　in　the　eighteenth　century。

This　languageloved；　tended；　and　trained　to　every　usenow　served　as　　the　basis　of　social　intercourse。　In　northern　countries；　the　nobles　and　　the　princes　passed　their　leisure　either　in　solitude；　or　in　hunting；　　fighting；　drinking；　and　the　like；　the　burghers　in　games　and　bodily　　exercises；　with　a　mixture　of　literary　or　festive　amusements。　In　Italy　　there　existed　a　neutral　ground；　where　people　of　every　origin；　if　they　　had　the　needful　talent　and　culture；　spent　their　time　in　conversation　　change　of　jest　and　earnest。　As　eating　small　part　of　such　　entertainments；　it　not　difficult　to　keep　at　a　distance　those　who　sought　　society　for　these　objects。　If　we　are　to　take　the　writers　of　dialogues　　literally；　the　loftiest　problems　of　human　existence　were　not　excluded　　from　the　conversation　of　thinking　men；　and　the　production　of　noble　　thoughts　was　not；　as　was　commonly　the　case　in　the　North；　the　work　of　　solitude；　but　of　society。　But　we　must　here　limit　ourselves　to　the　less　　serious　side　of　social　intercourseto　the　side　which　existed　only　for　　the　sake　of　amusement。

Social　Etiquette　

This　society；　at　all　events　at　the　beginning　of　the　sixteenth　century；　　was　a　matter　of　art；　and　had；　and　rested　on；　tacit　or　avowed　rules　of　　good　sense　and　propriety；　which　are　the　exact　reverse　of　all　mere　　etiquette。　In　less　polished　circles；　where　society　took　the　form　of　a　　permanent　corporation；　we　meet　with　a　system　of　formal　rules　and　a　　prescribed　mode　of　entrance；　as　was　the　case　with　those　wild　sets　of　　Florentine　artists　of　whom　Vasari　tells　us　that　they　were　capable　of　　giving　representations　of　the　best　comedies　of　the　day。　In　the　easier　　intercourse　of　society　it　was　not　unusual　to　select　some　distinguished　　lady　as　president；　whose　word　was　law　for　the　evening。

Everybody　knows　the　introduction　to　Boccaccio's　'Decameron；'　and　looks　　on　the　presidency　of　Pampinea　as　a　graceful　fiction。　That　it　was　so　in　　this　particular　case　is　a　matter　of　course；　but　the　fiction　was　　nevertheless　based　on　a　practice　which　often　occurred　in　reality。　　Firenzuola；　who　nearly　two　centuries　later　（1523）　pref…　aces　his　　collection　of　tales　in　a　similar　manner；　with　express　reference　to　　Boccaccio；　comes　assuredly　nearer　to　the　truth　when　he　puts　into　the　　mouth　of　the　queen　of　the　society　a　formal　speech　on　the　mode　of　　spending　the　hours　during　the　stay　which　the　company　proposed　to　make　　in　the　country。　The　day　was　to　begin　with　a　stroll　among　the　hills　　passed　in　philosophical　talk；　then　followed　breakfast；　with　music　and　　singing；　after　which　came　the　recitation；　in　some　cool；　shady　spot；　of　　a　new　poem；　the　subject　of　which　had　been　given　the　night　before；　in　　the　evening　the　whole　party　walked　to　a　spring　of　water　where　they　all　　sat　down　and　each　one　told　a　tale；　last　of　all　came　supper　and　lively　　conversation　'of　such　a　kind　that　the　women　might　listen　to　it　without　　shame　and　the　men　might　not　seem　to　be　speaking　under　the　influence　of　　wine。'　Ban…　dello；　in　the　introductions　and　dedications　to　single　　novels；　does　not　give　us；　it　is　true；　such　inaugural　discourses　as　　this；　since　the　circles　before　which　the　stories　are　told　are　　represented　as　already　formed；　but　he　gives　us　to　understand　in　other　　ways　how　rich；　how　manifold；　and　how　charming　the　conditions　of　society　　must　have　been。　Some　readers　may　be　of　opinion　that　no　good　was　to　be　　got　from　a　world　which　was　willing　to　be　amused　by　such　immoral　　literature。　It　would　be　juster　to　wonder　at　the　secure　foundations　of　a　　society　which；　notwithstanding　these　tales；　still　observed　the　rules　of　　order　and　decency；　and　which　knew　how　to　vary　such　pastimes　with　　serious　and　solid　discussion。　The　need　of　noble　forms　of　social　　intercourse　was　felt　to　be　stronger　than　all　others。　To　convince　　ourselves　of　it；　we　are　not　obliged　to　take　as　our　standard　the　　idealized　society　which　Castiglione　depicts　as　discussing　the　loftiest　　sentiments　and　aims　of　human　life　at　the　court　of　Guidobaldo　of　Urbino；　　and　Pietro　Bembo　at　the　castle　of　Asolo　The　society　described　by　　Bandello；　with　all　the　frivolities　which　may　be　laid　to　its　charge；　　enables　us　to　form　the　best　notion　of　the　easy　and　polished　dignity；　of　　the　urbane　kindliness；　of　the　intellectual　freedom；　of　the　wit　and　the　　graceful　dilettantism；　which　distinguished　these　circles。　A　significant　　proof　of　the　value　of　such　circles　lies　in　the　fact　that　the　women　who　　were　the　centers　of　them　could　become　famous　and　illustrious　without　in　　any　way　compromising　their　reputation。　Among　the　patronesses　of　　Bandello；　for　example；　Isabella　Gonzaga　（born　an　Este）　was　talked　of　　unfavorably　not　through　any　fault　of　her　own；　but　on　account　of　the　　too…free…lived　young　ladies　who　filled　her　court。　Giulia　Gonzaga　　Colonna；　Ippolita　Sforza　married　to　a　Bentivoglio；　Bianca　Rangona；　　Cecilia　Gallerana；　Camilla　Scarampa；　and　others；　were　either　altogether　　irreproachable；　or　their　social　fame　threw　into　the　shade　whatever　they　　may　have　done　amiss。　The　most　famous　woman　of　Italy；　Vittoria　Colonna　　（b。　1490；　d。　1547）；　the　friend　of　Castiglioni　and　Michelangelo；　enjoyed　　the　reputation　of　a　saint。　It　is　hard　to　give　such　a　picture　of　the　　unconstrained　intercourse　of　these　circles　in　the　city；　at　the　baths；　　or　in　the　country；　as　will　furnish　literal　proof　of　the　superiority　of　　Italy　in　this　respect　over　the　rest　of　Europe。　But　let　us　read　　Bandello；　and　then　ask　ourselves　if　anything　of　the　same　kind　would　　have　been　possible；　say；　in　France；　before　this　kind　of　society　was　　there　introduced　by　people　like　himself。　No　doubt　the　supreme　　achievements　of　the　human　mind　were　then　produced　independently　of　the　　help　of　the　drawing…room。　Yet　it　would　be　unjust　to　rate　the　influence　　of　the　latter　on　art　and　poetry　too　low；　if　only　for　the　reason　that　　society　helped　to　shape　that　which　existed　in　no　other　countrya　　widespread　interest　in　artistic　production　and　an　intelligent　and　　critical　public　opinion。　And　apart　from　this；　society　of　the　kind　we　　have　described　was　in　itself　a　natural　flower　of　that　life　and　culture　　which　was　then　purely　Italian；　and　which　since　then　has　extended　to　the　　rest　of　Europe。

In　Florence　society　was　powerfully　affected　by　literature　and　politics。　　Lorenzo　the　Magnificent　was　supreme　over　his　circle；　not；　as　we　might　　be　led　to　believe；　through　the　princely　position　which　he　occupied；　but　　rather　through　the　wonderful　tact　he　displayed　in　giving　perfect　　freedom　of　action　to　the　many　and　varied　natures　which　surrounded　him。　　We　see　how　gently　he　dealt　with　his　great　tutor　Politian；　and　how　the　　sovereignty　of　the　poet　and　scholar　was　reconciled；　though　not　without　　difficulty；　with　the　inevitable　reserve　prescribed　by　the　approaching　　change　in　the　position