biographical study of a. w. kinglake-及12准
梓囚徒貧圭鮗 ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈梓囚徒貧圭鮗 ● 辛指欺云匈競何
!!!!隆堋響頼紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響
inous and entangled matter察but it is not unique amongst martial records as ;Eothen; is unique amongst books of travel此it is through ;Eothen; that its author has soared into a classic察and bids fair to hold his place。 And察apart from the merit of style察great campaigns lose interest in a third察if not in a second generation察their historical consequence effaced through lapse of years察their policy seen to have been nugatory or mischievous察their chronicles察swallowed greedily at the birth like Saturn's progeny察returning to vex their parent察relegated finally to an honourable exile in the library upper shelves察where they hold a place eyed curiously察not invaded
;devoured As fast as they are made察forgot as soon As done。 。 。 。 To have done察is to hang Quite out of fashion察like a rusty mail察In monumental mockery。;
CHAPTER V ´ MADAME NOVIKOFF
THE Cabinet Edition of ;The Invasion of the Crimea; appeared in 1877察shortly after the Servian struggle for independence察which aroused in England universal interest and sympathy。 Kinglake had heard from the lips of a valued lady friend the tragic death´tale of her brother Nicholas Kireeff察who fell fighting as a volunteer on the side of the gallant Servian against the Turk此and察much moved by the recital察offered to honour the memory of the dead hero in the Preface to his forthcoming edition。 He kept his word察made sympathetic reference to M。 Kireeff in the opening of his Preface察 but passed in pursuance of his original design to a hostile impeachment of Russia察its people察its church察its ruler。 This was an error of judgment and of feeling察and the lady察reading the manuscript察indignantly desired him to burn the whole rather than commit the outrage of associating her brother's name with an attack on causes and personages dear to him as to herself。 Kinglake listened in silence察then tendered to her a CRAYON ROUGE察begging her to efface all that pained her。 She did so察and察diminished by three´fourths of its matter察the Preface appears in Vol。 I。 of the Cabinet Edition。 The erasure was no slight sacrifice to an author of Kinglake's literary sensitiveness察mutilating as it did the integrity of a carefully schemed composition察and leaving visible the scar。 He sets forth the strongly sentimental and romantic side of Russian temperament。 Love of the Holy Shrines begat the war of 1853察racial ardour the war of 1876。 The first was directed by a single will察the second by national enthusiasm察yet the mind of Nicholas was no less tossed by a breathless strife of opposing desires and moods than was Russia at large by the struggle between Panslavism and statesmanship。 Kinglake paints vividly the imposing figure of the young Kireeff察his stature察beauty察bravery察the white robe he wore incarnadined by death´wounds察his body captured by the hateful foes。 He goes on to tell how myth rose like an exhalation round his memory此how legends of ;a giant piling up hecatombs by a mighty slaughter; reverberated through mansion and cottage察town and village察cathedral and church察until thousands of volunteers rushed to arms that they might go where young Kireeff had gone。 Alexander's hand was forced察and the war began察which but for England's intervention would have cleared Europe of the Turk。 We have the text察but not the sermon察the Preface ends abruptly with an almost clumsy peroration。
The lady who inspired both the eulogy and the curtailment was Madame Novikoff察more widely known perhaps as O。 K。察with whom Kinglake maintained during the last twenty years of life an intimate and mutual friendship。 Madame Olga Novikoff察NEE Kireeff察 is a Russian lady of aristocratic rank both by parentage and marriage。 In a lengthened sojourn at Vienna with her brother´in´ law察the Russian ambassador察she learned the current business of diplomacy。 An eager religious propagandist察she formed alliance with the ;Old Catholics; on the Continent察and with many among the High Church English clergy察becoming察together with her brother Alexander察a member of the REUNION NATIONALE察a society for the union of Christendom。 Her interest in education has led her to devote extensive help to school and church building and endowment on her son's estate。 God´daughter to the Czar Nicholas察she is a devoted Imperialist察nor less in sympathy察as were all her family察 with Russian patriotism此after the death of her brother in Servia on July 6/18察1876察she became a still more ardent Slavophile。 The three articles of her creed are察she says察those of her country察 Orthodoxy察Autocracy察Nationalism。 Her political aspirations have been guided察and guided right察by her tact and goodness of heart。 Her life's aim has been to bring about a cordial understanding between England and her native land察there is little doubt that her influence with leading Liberal politicians察and her vigorous allocutions in the Press察had much to do with the enthusiasm manifested by England for the liberation of the Danubian States。 Readers of the Princess Lieven's letters to Earl Grey will recall the part played by that able ambassadress in keeping this country neutral through the crisis of 1828´9察to her Madame Novikoff has been likened察and probably with truth察by the Turkish Press both English and Continental。 She was accused in 1876 of playing on the religious side of Mr。 Gladstone's character to secure his interest in the Danubians as members of the Greek Church察while with unecclesiastical people she was said to be equally skilful on the political side察converting at the same time Anglophobe Russia by her letters in the ;Moscow Gazette。; Mr。 Gladstone's leanings to Montenegro were attributed angrily in the English ;Standard; to Madame Novikoff此 A serious statesman should know better than to catch contagion from the petulant enthusiasm of a Russian Apostle。; The contagion was in any case caught察and to some purpose察letter after letter had been sent by the lady to the great statesman察then in temporary retirement察without reply察until the last of these察 a bitter cry of a sister for a sacrificed brother察─brought a feeling answer from Mrs。 Gladstone察saying that her husband was deeply moved by the appeal察and was writing on the subject。 In a few days appeared his famous pamphlet察 Bulgarian Horrors and the Question of the East。;
Carlyle advised that Madame Novikoff's scattered papers should be worked into a volume察they appeared under the title ;Is Russia Wrong拭─with a preface by Froude察the moderate and ultra´prudent tone of which infuriated Hayward and Kinglake察as not being sufficiently appreciative。 Hayward declared some woman had biassed him察Kinglake was of opinion that by studying the ETAT of Queen Elizabeth Froude had ;gone and turned himself into an old maid。;
Froude's Preface to her next work察 Russia and England察a Protest and an Appeal察─by O。 K。察1880察was worded in a very different tone and satisfied all her friends。 The book was also reviewed with highest praise by Gladstone in ;The Nineteenth Century。; Learning that an assault upon it was contemplated in ;The Quarterly察─ Kinglake offered to supply the editor察Dr。 Smith察with materials which might be so used as to neutralize a PERSONAL attack upon O。 K。 Smith entreated him to compose the whole article himself。 ;I could promise you察─he writes察 that the authorship should be kept a profound secret察─but this Kinglake seems to have thought undesirable。 The article appeared in April察1880察under the title of ;The Slavonic Menace to Europe。; It opens with a panegyric on the authoress此 She has mastered our language with conspicuous success察she expostulates as easily as she reproaches察and she exhibits as much facility in barbing shafts of satire as in framing specious excuses for daring acts of diplomacy。; It insists on the high esteem felt for her by both the Russian and Austrian governments察telling with much humour an anecdote of Count Beust察 the Prime Minister of Austria during her residence in Vienna。 The Count察after meeting her at a dinner party at the Turkish Embassy察 composed a set of verses in her honour察and gave them to her察but she forgot to mention them to her brother´in´law。 The Prime Minister察encountering the latter察asked his opinion of the verses察 and the ambassador was greatly amazed at knowing nothing of the matter。 23 From amenities towards the authoress察the article passes abruptly to hostile criticism of the book察declares it to be proscribed in Russia as mischievous察and to have precipitated a general war by keeping up English interest in Servian rebellion。 It sneers in doubtful taste at the lady's learning
;sit non doctissima conjux察Sit nox cum somno察sit sine lite dies察
denounces the Slavs as incapable of being welded into a nation察 urging that their independence must destroy Austria´Hungary察a consummation desired by Madame Novikoff察with her feline contempt for ;poor dear Austria察─but which all must unite to prevent if they would avert a European war。
How could one clear harp察men asked themselves as they read察have produced so diverse tones拭 The riddle is solved when we