what is property-第97节
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
is; who formally teaches that the world is not an EMANATION from Divinity;which is pure pantheism;but a FLOW of Divinity。
I do not pretend; however; to deny that 〃L'Esquisse〃 contains some excellent things; but; by the author's declaration; these things are not original with him; it is the system which is his。 That is undoubtedly the reason why M。 Lamennais speaks so contemptuously of his predecessors in philosophy; and disdains to quote his originals。 He thinks that; since 〃L'Esquisse〃 contains all true philosophy; the world will lose nothing when the names and works of the old philosophers perish。 M。 Lamennais; who renders glory to God in beautiful songs; does not know how as well to render justice to his fellows。 His fatal fault is this appropriation of knowledge; which the theologians call the PHILOSOPHICAL SIN; or the SIN AGAINST THE HOLY GHOSTa sin which will not damn you; proletaires; nor me either。
In short; 〃L'Esquisse;〃 judged as a system; and divested of all which its author borrows from previous systems; is a commonplace work; whose method consists in constantly explaining the known by the unknown; and in giving entites for abstractions; and tautologies for proofs。 Its whole theodicy is a work not of genius but of imagination; a patching up of neo…Platonic ideas。 The psychological portion amounts to nothing; M。 Lamennais openly ridiculing labors of this character; without which; however; metaphysics is impossible。 The book; which treats of logic and its methods; is weak; vague; and shallow。 Finally; we find in the physical and physiological speculations which M。 Lamennais deduces from his trinitarian cosmogony grave errors; the preconceived design of accommodating facts to theory; and the substitution in almost every case of hypothesis for reality。 The third volume on industry and art is the most interesting to read; and the best。 It is true that M。 Lamennais can boast of nothing but his style。 As a philosopher; he has added not a single idea to those which existed before him。
Why; then; this excessive mediocrity of M。 Lamennais considered as a thinker; a mediocrity which disclosed itself at the time of the publication of the 〃Essai sur l'Indifference!〃? It is because (remember this well; proletaires!) Nature makes no man truly complete; and because the development of certain faculties almost always excludes an equal development of the opposite faculties; it is because M。 Lamennais is preeminently a poet; a man of feeling and sentiment。 Look at his style;exuberant; sonorous; picturesque; vehement; full of exaggeration and invective;and hold it for certain that no man possessed of such a style was ever a true metaphysician。 This wealth of expression and illustration; which everybody admires; becomes in M Lamennais the incurable cause of his philosophical impotence。 His flow of language; and his sensitive nature misleading his imagination; he thinks that he is reasoning when he is only repeating himself; and readily takes a description for a logical deduction。 Hence his horror of positive ideas; his feeble powers of analysis; his pronounced taste for indefinite analogies; verbal abstractions; hypothetical generalities; in short; all sorts of entites。
Further; the entire life of M。 Lamennais is conclusive proof of his anti…philosophical genius。 Devout even to mysticism; an ardent ultramontane; an intolerant theocrat; he at first feels the double influence of the religious reaction and the literary theories which marked the beginning of this century; and falls back to the middle ages and Gregory VII。; then; suddenly becoming a progressive Christian and a democrat; he gradually leans towards rationalism; and finally falls into deism。 At present; everybody waits at the trap…door。 As for me; though I would not swear to it; I am inclined to think that M。 Lamennais; already taken with scepticism; will die in a state of indifference。 He owes to individual reason and methodical doubt this expiation of his early essays。
It has been pretended that M。 Lamennais; preaching now a theocracy; now universal democracy; has been always consistent; that; under different names; he has sought invariably one and the same thing;unity。 Pitiful excuse for an author surprised in the very act of contradiction! What would be thought of a man who; by turns a servant of despotism under Louis XVI; a demagogue with Robespierre; a courtier of the Emperor; a bigot during fifteen years of the Restoration; a conservative since 1830; should dare to say that he ever had wished for but one thing;public order? Would he be regarded as any the less a renegade from all parties? Public order; unity; the world's welfare; social harmony; the union of the nations;concerning each of these things there is no possible difference of opinion。 Everybody wishes them; the character of the publicist depends only upon the means by which he proposes to arrive at them。 But
why look to M。 Lamennais for a steadfastness of opinion; which he himself repudiates? Has he not said; 〃The mind has no law; that which I believe to…day; I did not believe yesterday; I do not know that I shall believe it to…morrow〃?
No; there is no real superiority among men; since all talents and capacities are combined never in one individual。 This man has the power of thought; that one imagination and style; still another industrial and commercial capacity。 By our very nature and education; we possess only special aptitudes which are limited and confined; and which become consequently more necessary as they gain in depth and strength。 Capacities are to each other as functions and persons; who would dare to classify them in ranks? The finest genius is; by the laws of his existence and development; the most dependent upon the society which creates him。 Who would dare to make a god of the glorious child?
〃It is not strength which makes the man;〃 said a Hercules of the market…place to the admiring crowd; 〃it is character。〃 That man; who had only his muscles; held force in contempt。 The lesson is a good one; proletaires; we should profit by it。 It is not talent (which is also a force); it is not knowledge; it is not beauty which makes the man。 It is heart; courage; will; virtue。 Now; if we are equal in that which makes us men; how can the accidental distribution of secondary faculties detract from our manhood?
Remember that privilege is naturally and inevitably the lot of the weak; and do not be misled by the fame which accompanies certain talents whose greatest merit consists in their rarity; and a long and toilsome apprenticeship。 It is easier for M。 Lamennais to recite a philippic; or sing a humanitarian ode after the Platonic fashion; than to discover a single useful truth; it is easier for an economist to apply the laws of production and distribution than to write ten lines in the style of M。 Lamennais; it is easier for both to speak than to act。 You; then; who put your hands to the work; who alone truly create; why do you wish me to admit your inferiority? But; what am I saying?
Yes; you are inferior; for you lack virtue and will! Ready for labor and for battle; you have; when liberty and equality are in question; neither courage nor character!
In the preface to his pamphlet on 〃Le Pays et le Gouvernement;〃 as well as in his defence before the jury; M。 Lamennais frankly declared himself an advocate of property。 Out of regard for the author and his misfortune; I shall abstain from characterizing this declaration; and from examining these two sorrowful performances。 M。 Lamennais seems to be only the tool of a quasi… radical party; which flatters him in order to use him; without respect for a glorious; but hence forth powerless; old age。 What means this profession of faith? From the first number of 〃L'Avenir〃 to 〃L'Esquisse d'une Philosophie;〃 M。 Lamennais always favors equality; association; and even a sort of vague and indefinite communism。 M。 Lamennais; in recognizing the right of property; gives the lie to his past career; and renounces his most generous tendencies。 Can it; then; be true that in this man; who has been too roughly treated; but who is also too easily flattered; strength of talent has already outlived strength of will?
It is said that M。 Lamennais has rejected the offers of several of his friends to try to procure for him a commutation of his sentence。 M。 Lamennais prefers to serve out his time。 May not this affectation of a false stoicism come from the same source as his recognition of the right of property? The Huron; when taken prisoner; hurls insults and threats at his conqueror;that is the heroism of the savage; the martyr prays for his executioners; and is willing to receive from them his life;that is the heroism of the Christian。 Why has the apostle of love become an apostle of anger and revenge? Has; then; the translator of 〃L'Imitation〃 forgotten that he who offends charity cannot honor virtue? Galileo; retracting on his knees before the tribunal of the inquisition his heresy in regard to the movement of the earth; and recovering at that price his liberty; seems to me a hundred times grander than M。 Lamennais。 What! if we suffer for truth and justice; must we; in retaliation; thrust our persecutors out