what is property-第96节
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
Nevertheless; you all feel that a revolution is to come; and that you alone can accomplish it。 What; then; is the idea which governs you; proletaires of the nineteenth century?for really I cannot call you revolutionists。 What do you think?what do you believe?what do you want? Be guarded in your reply。 I have read faithfully your favorite journals; your most esteemed authors。 I find everywhere only vain and puerile _entites_; nowhere do I discover an idea。
I will explain the meaning of this word _entite_;new; without doubt; to most of you。
By _entite_ is generally understood a substance which the imagination grasps; but which is incognizable by the senses and the reason。 Thus the SOPORIFIC POWER of opium; of which Sganarelle speaks; and the PECCANT HUMORS of ancient medicine; are _entites_。 The _entite_ is the support of those who do not wish to confess their ignorance。 It is incomprehensible; or; as St。 Paul says; the _argumentum non apparentium_。 In philosophy; the _entite_ is often only a repetition of words which add nothing to the thought。
For example; when M。 Pierre Lerouxwho says so many excellent things; but who is too fond; in my opinion; of his Platonic formulasassures us that the evils of humanity are due to our IGNORANCE OF LIFE; M。 Pierre Leroux utters an _entite;_ for it is evident that if we are evil it is because we do not know how to live; but the knowledge of this fact is of no value to us。
When M。 Edgar Quinet declares that France suffers and declines because there is an ANTAGONISM of men and of interests; he declares an _entite;_ for the problem is to discover the cause of this antagonism。
When M。 Lamennais; in thunder tones; preaches self…sacrifice and love; he proclaims two _entites_; for we need to know on what conditions self…sacrifice and love can spring up and exist。
So also; proletaires; when you talk of LIBERTY; PROGRESS; and THE SOVEREIGNTY OF THE PEOPLE; you make of these naturally intelligible things so many _entites_ in space: for; on the one hand; we need a new definition of liberty; since that of '89 no longer suffices; and; on the other; we must know in what direction society should proceed in order to be in progress。 As for the sovereignty of the people; that is a grosser _entite_ than the sovereignty of reason; it is the _entite_ of _entites_。 In fact; since sovereignty can no more be conceived of outside of the people than outside of reason; it remains to be ascertained who; among the people; shall exercise the sovereignty; and; among so many minds; which shall be the sovereigns。 To say that the people should elect their representatives is to say that the people should recognize their sovereigns; which does not remove the difficulty at all。
But suppose that; equal by birth; equal before the law; equal in personality; equal in social functions; you wish also to be equal in conditions。
Suppose that; perceiving all the mutual relations of men; whether they produce or exchange or consume; to be relations of commutative justice;in a word; social relations; suppose; I say; that; perceiving this; you wish to give this natural society a legal existence; and to establish the fact by law;
I say that then you need a clear; positive; and exact expression of your whole idea;that is; an expression which states at once the principle; the means; and the end; and I add that that expression is ASSOCIATION。
And since the association of the human race dates; at least rightfully; from the beginning of the world; and has gradually established and perfected itself by successively divesting itself of its negative elements; slavery; nobility; despotism; aristocracy; and feudalism;I say that; to eliminate the last negation of society; to formulate the last revolutionary idea; you must change your old rallying…cries; NO MORE ABSOLUTISM; NO MORE NOBILITY; NO MORE SLAVES! into that of NO MORE PROPERTY! 。 。 。
But I know what astonishes you; poor souls; blasted by the wind of poverty; and crushed by your patrons' pride: it is EQUALITY; whose consequences frighten you。 How; you have said in your journal;how can we 〃dream of a level which; being unnatural; is therefore unjust? How shall we pay the day's labor of a Cormenin or a Lamennais?〃
Plebeians; listen! When; after the battle of Salamis; the Athenians assembled to award the prizes for courage; after the ballots had been collected; it was found that each combatant had one vote for the first prize; and Themistocles all the votes for the second。 The people of Minerva were crowned by their own hands。 Truly heroic souls! all were worthy of the olive…branch; since all had ventured to claim it for themselves。 Antiquity praised this sublime spirit。 Learn; proletaires; to esteem yourselves; and to respect your dignity。 You wish to be free; and you know not how to be citizens。 Now; whoever says 〃citizens〃 necessarily says equals。
If I should call myself Lamennais or Cormenin; and some journal; speaking of me; should burst forth with these hyperboles; INCOMPARABLE GENIUS; SUPERIOR MIND; CONSUMMATE VIRTUE; NOBLE CHARACTER; I should not like it; and should complain;first; because such eulogies are never deserved; and; second; because they furnish a bad example。 But I wish; in order to reconcile you to equality; to measure for you the greatest literary personage of our century。 Do not accuse me of envy; proletaires; if I; a defender of equality; estimate at their proper value talents which are universally admired; and which I; better than any one; know how to recognize。 A dwarf can always measure a giant: all that he needs is a yardstick。
You have seen the pretentious announcements of 〃L'Esquisse d'une Philosophie;〃 and you have admired the work on trust; for either you have not read it; or; if you have; you are incapable of judging it。 Acquaint yourselves; then; with this speculation more brilliant than sound; and; while admiring the enthusiasm of the author; cease to pity those useful labors which only habit and the great number of the persons engaged in them render contemptible。 I shall be brief; for; notwithstanding the importance of the subject and the genius of the author; what I have to say is of but little moment。
M。 Lamennais starts with the existence of God。 How does he demonstrate it? By Cicero's argument;that is; by the consent of the human race。 There is nothing new in that。 We have still to find out whether the belief of the human race is legitimate; or; as Kant says; whether our subjective certainty of the existence of God corresponds with the objective truth。 This; however; does not trouble M。 Lamennais。 He says that; if the human race believes; it is because it has a reason for believing。
Then; having pronounced the name of God; M。 Lamennais sings a hymn; and that is his demonstration!
This first hypothesis admitted; M。 Lamennais follows it with a second; namely; that there are three persons in God。 But; while Christianity teaches the dogma of the Trinity only on the authority of revelation; M。 Lamennais pretends to arrive at it by the sole force of argument; and he does not perceive that his pretended demonstration is; from beginning to end; anthropomorphism;that is; an ascription of the faculties of the human mind and the powers of nature to the Divine substance。 New songs; new hymns!
God and the Trinity thus DEMONSTRATED; the philosopher passes to the creation;a third hypothesis; in which M。 Lamennais; always eloquent; varied; and sublime; DEMONSTRATES that God made the world neither of nothing; nor of something; nor of himself; that he was free in creating; but that nevertheless he could not but create; that there is in matter a matter which is not matter; that the archetypal ideas of the world are separated from each other; in the Divine mind; by a division which is obscure and unintelligible; and yet substantial and real; which involves intelligibility; &c。 We meet with like contradictions concerning the origin of evil。 To explain this problem;one of the profoundest in philosophy;M。 Lamennais at one time denies evil; at another makes God the author of evil; and at still another seeks outside of God a first cause which is not God;an amalgam of _entites_ more or less incoherent; borrowed from Plato; Proclus; Spinoza; I might say even from all philosophers。
Having thus established his trinity of hypotheses; M。 Lamennais deduces therefrom; by a badly connected chain of analogies; his whole philosophy。 And it is here especially that we notice the syncretism which is peculiar to him。 The theory of M。 Lamennais embraces all systems; and supports all opinions。 Are you a materialist? Suppress; as useless _entites_; the three persons in God; then; starting directly from heat; light; and electro… magnetism;which; according to the author; are the three original fluids; the three primary external manifestations of Will; Intelligence; and Love;you have a materialistic and atheistic cosmogony。 On the contrary; are you wedded to spiritualism? With the theory of the immateriality of the body; you are able to see everywhere nothing but spirits。 Finally; if you incline to pantheism; you will be satisfied by M。 Lamennais; who formally teaches that the world is not an EMANATION from Divinity