lyrical poems-第2节
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
Art。 And hence something constrained and artificial blends with the freshness of the Elizabethan literature。 For its great underlying elements it necessarily reverts to those embodied in our own earlier poets； Chaucer above all； to whom； after barely one hundred and fifty years； men looked up as a father of song： but in points of style and treatment； the poets of the sixteenth century lie under a double external influencethat of the poets of Greece and Rome （known either in their own tongues or by translation）； and that of the modern literatures which had themselves undergone the same classical impulse。 Italy was the source most regarded during the more strictly Elizabethan period； whence its lyrical poetry and the dramatic in a less degree； are coloured much less by pure and severe classicalism with its closeness to reality； than by the allegorical and elaborate style； fancy and fact curiously blended； which had been generated in Italy under the peculiar and local circumstances of her pilgrimage in literature and art from the age of Dante onwards。 Whilst that influence lasted； such brilliant pictures of actual life； such directness； movement； and simplicity in style； as Chaucer often shows； were not yet again attainable： and although satire； narrative； the poetry of reflection； were meanwhile not wholly unknown； yet they only appear in force at the close of this period。 And then also the pressure of political and religious strife； veiled in poetry during the greater part of Elizabeth's actual reign under the forms of pastoral and allegory； again imperiously breaks in upon the gracious but somewhat slender and artificial fashions of England's Helicon： the DIVOM NUMEN； SEDESQUE QUIETAE which； in some degree the Elizabethan poets offer； disappear； until filling the central years of the seventeenth century we reach an age as barren for inspiration of new song as the Wars of the Roses； although the great survivors from earlier years mask this sterility；masking also the revolution in poetical manner and matter which we can see secretly preparing in the later 'Cavalier' poets； but which was not clearly recognised before the time of Dryden's culmination。
In the period here briefly sketched； what is Herrick's portion？ His verse is eminent for sweet and gracious fluency； this is a real note of the 'Elizabethan' poets。 His subjects are frequently pastoral； with a classical tinge； more or less slight； infused； his language； though not free from exaggeration； is generally free from intellectual conceits and distortion； and is eminent throughout for a youthful NAIVETE。 Such； also； are qualities of the latter sixteenth century literature。 But if these characteristics might lead us to call Herrick 'the last of the Elizabethans；' born out of due time； the differences between him and them are not less marked。 Herrick's directness of speech is accompanied by an equally clear and simple presentment of his thought； we have； perhaps； no poet who writes more consistently and earnestly with his eye upon his subject。 An allegorical or mystical treatment is alien from him： he handles awkwardly the few traditional fables which he introduces。 He is also wholly free from Italianizing tendencies： his classicalism even is that of an English student；of a schoolboy； indeed； if he be compared with a Jonson or a Milton。 Herrick's personal eulogies on his friends and others； further； witness to the extension of the field of poetry after Elizabeth's age；in which his enthusiastic geniality； his quick and easy transitions of subject； have also little precedent。
If； again； we compare Herrick's book with those of his fellow… poets for a hundred years before； very few are the traces which he gives of imitation； or even of study。 During the long interval between Herrick's entrance on his Cambridge and his clerical careers （an interval all but wholly obscure to us）； it is natural to suppose that he read； at any rate； his Elizabethan predecessors： yet （beyond those general similarities already noticed） the Editor can find no positive proof of familiarity。 Compare Herrick with Marlowe； Greene； Breton； Drayton； or other pretty pastoralists of the HELICONhis general and radical unlikeness is what strikes us； whilst he is even more remote from the passionate intensity of Sidney and Shakespeare； the Italian graces of Spenser； the pensive beauty of PARTHENOPHIL； of DIELLA； of FIDESSA； of the HECATOMPATHIA and the TEARS OF FANCY。
Nor is Herrick's resemblance nearer to many of the contemporaries who have been often grouped with him。 He has little in common with the courtly elegance； the learned polish； which too rarely redeem commonplace and conceits in Carew； Habington； Lovelace； Cowley； or Waller。 Herrick has his CONCETTI also： but they are in him generally true plays of fancy； he writes throughout far more naturally than these lyrists； who； on the other hand； in their unfrequent successes reach a more complete and classical form of expression。 Thus； when Carew speaks of an aged fair one
When beauty； youth； and all sweets leave her； Love may return； but lovers never！
Cowley； of his mistress
Love in her sunny eyes does basking play； Love walks the pleasant mazes of her hair：
or take Lovelace； 'To Lucasta；' Waller； in his 'Go； lovely rose；'we have a finish and condensation which Herrick hardly attains； a literary quality alien from his 'woodnotes wild；' which may help us to understand the very small appreciation he met from his age。 He had 'a pretty pastoral gale of fancy；' said Phillips； cursorily dismissing Herrick in his THEATRUM： not suspecting how inevitably artifice and mannerism； if fashionable for awhile； pass into forgetfulness； whilst the simple cry of Nature partake in her permanence。
Donne and Marvell； stronger men； leave also no mark on our poet。 The elaborate thought； the metrical harshness of the first； could find no counterpart in Herrick； whilst Marvell； beyond him in imaginative power； though twisting it too often into contortion and excess； appears to have been little known as a lyrist then： as； indeed； his great merits have never reached anything like due popular recognition。 Yet Marvell's natural description is nearer Herrick's in felicity and insight than any of the poets named above。 Nor； again； do we trace anything of Herbert or Vaughan in Herrick's NOBLE NUMBERS； which； though unfairly judged if held insincere； are obviously far distant from the intense conviction； the depth and inner fervour of his high…toned contemporaries。
It is among the great dramatists of this age that we find the only English influences palpably operative on this singularly original writer。 The greatest； in truth； is wholly absent： and it is remarkable that although Herrick may have joined in the wit…contests and genialities of the literary clubs in London soon after Shakespeare's death； and certainly lived in friendship with some who had known him； yet his name is never mentioned in the poetical commemorations of the HESPERIDES。 In Herrick； echoes from Fletcher's idyllic pieces in the FAITHFUL SHEPHERDESS are faintly traceable； from his songs； 'Hear what Love can do；' and 'The lusty Spring；' more distinctly。 But to Ben Jonson； whom Herrick addresses as his patron saint in song； and ranks on the highest list of his friends； his obligations are much more perceptible。 In fact； Jonson's non…dramatic poetry；the EPIGRAMS and FOREST of 1616； the UNDERWOODS of 1641； （he died in 1637）； supply models； generally admirable in point of art； though of very unequal merit in their execution and contents； of the principal forms under which we may range Herrick's HESPERIDES。 The graceful love…song； the celebration of feasts and wit； the encomia of friends； the epigram as then understood； are all here represented： even Herrick's vein in natural description is prefigured in the odes to Penshurst and Sir Robert Wroth； of 1616。 And it is in the religious pieces of the NOBLE NUMBERS； for which Jonson afforded the least copious precedents； that； as a rule； Herrick is least successful。
Even if we had not the verses on his own book； （the most noteworthy of which are here printed as PREFATORY；） in proof that Herrick was no careless singer； but a true artist； working with conscious knowledge of his art； we might have inferred the fact from the choice of Jonson as his model。 That great poet； as Clarendon justly remarked； had 'judgment to order and govern fancy； rather than excess of fancy： his productions being slow and upon deliberation。' No writer could be better fitted for the guidance of one so fancy…free as Herrick； to whom the curb； in the old phrase； was more needful than the spur； and whose invention； more fertile and varied than Jonson's； was ready at once to fill up the moulds of form provided。 He does this with a lively facility； contrasting much with the evidence of labour in his master's work。 Slowness and deliberation are the last qualities suggested by Herrick。 Yet it may be doubted whether the volatile ease； the effortless grace； the wild bird…like fluency with which he
Scatters his loose notes in the waste of air
are not； in truth； the results of exquisite art working in co… operation with the gifts of nature。 T
