on liberty-及32准
梓囚徒貧圭鮗 ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈梓囚徒貧圭鮗 ● 辛指欺云匈競何
!!!!隆堋響頼紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響
pain to any one。
I have reserved for the last place a large class of questions
respecting the limits of government interference察which察though
closely connected with the subject of this Essay察do not察in
strictness察belong to it。 These are cases in which the reasons against
interference do not turn upon the principle of liberty此the question
is not about restraining the actions of individuals察but about helping
them察it is asked whether the government should do察or cause to be
done察something for their benefit察instead of leaving it to be done by
themselves察individually or in voluntary combination。
The objections to government interference察when it is not such as to
involve infringement of liberty察may be of three kinds。
The first is察when the thing to be done is likely to be better
done by individuals than by the government。 Speaking generally
there is no one so fit to conduct any business察or to determine how or
by whom it shall be conducted察as those who are personally
interested in it。 This principle condemns the interferences察once so
common察of the legislature察or the officers of government察with the
ordinary processes of industry。 But this part of the subject has
been sufficiently enlarged upon by political economists察and is not
particularly related to the principles of this Essay。
The second objection is more nearly allied to our subject。 In many
cases察though individuals may not do the particular thing so well
on the average察as the officers of government察it is nevertheless
desirable that it should be done by them察rather than by the
government察as a means to their own mental education´ a mode of
strengthening their active faculties察exercising their judgment察and
giving them a familiar knowledge of the subjects with which they are
thus left to deal。 This is a principal察though not the sole
recommendation of jury trial in cases not political察of free and
popular local and municipal institutions察of the conduct of industrial
and philanthropic enterprises by voluntary associations。 These are not
questions of liberty察and are connected with that subject only by
remote tendencies察but they are questions of development。 It belongs
to a different occasion from the present to dwell on these things as
parts of national education察as being察in truth察the peculiar training
of a citizen察the practical part of the political education of a
free people察taking them out of the narrow circle of personal and
family selfishness察and accustoming them to the comprehension of joint
interests察the management of joint concerns´ habituating them to act
from public or semi´public motives察and guide their conduct by aims
which unite instead of isolating them from one another。 Without
these habits and powers察a free constitution can neither be worked nor
preserved察as is exemplified by the too´often transitory nature of
political freedom in countries where it does not rest upon a
sufficient basis of local liberties。 The management of purely local
business by the localities察and of the great enterprises of industry
by the union of those who voluntarily supply the pecuniary means察is
further recommended by all the advantages which have been set forth in
this Essay as belonging to individuality of development察and diversity
of modes of action。 Government operations tend to be everywhere alike。
With individuals and voluntary associations察on the contrary察there
are varied experiments察and endless diversity of experience。 What
the State can usefully do is to make itself a central depository
and active circulator and diffuser察of the experience resulting from
many trials。 Its business is to enable each experimentalist to benefit
by the experiments of others察instead of tolerating no experiments but
its own。
The third and most cogent reason for restricting the interference of
government is the great evil of adding unnecessarily to its power。
Every function superadded to those already exercised by the government
causes its influence over hopes and fears to be more widely
diffused察and converts察more and more察the active and ambitious part
of the public into hangers´on of the government察or of some party
which aims at becoming the government。 If the roads察the railways察the
banks察the insurance offices察the great joint´stock companies察the
universities察and the public charities察were all of them branches of
the government察if察in addition察the municipal corporations and
local boards察with all that now devolves on them察became departments
of the central administration察if the employes of all these
different enterprises were appointed and paid by the government察and
looked to the government for every rise in life察not all the freedom
of the press and popular constitution of the legislature would make
this or any other country free otherwise than in name。 And the evil
would be greater察the more efficiently and scientifically the
administrative machinery was constructed´ the more skilful the
arrangements for obtaining the best qualified hands and heads with
which to work it。 In England it has of late been proposed that all the
members of the civil service of government should be selected by
competitive examination察to obtain for these employments the most
intelligent and instructed persons procurable察and much has been
said and written for and against this proposal。 One of the arguments
most insisted on by its opponents is that the occupation of a
permanent official servant of the State does not hold out sufficient
prospects of emolument and importance to attract the highest
talents察which will always be able to find a more inviting career in
the professions察or in the service of companies and other public
bodies。 One would not have been surprised if this argument had been
used by the friends of the proposition察as an answer to its
principal difficulty。 Coming from the opponents it is strange
enough。 What is urged as an objection is the safety´valve of the
proposed system。 If indeed all the high talent of the country could be
drawn into the service of the government察a proposal tending to
bring about that result might well inspire uneasiness。 If every part
of the business of society which required organised concert察or
large and comprehensive views察were in the hands of the government
and if government offices were universally filled by the ablest men
all the enlarged culture and practised intelligence in the country
except the purely speculative察would be concentrated in a numerous
bureaucracy察to whom alone the rest of the community would look for
all things此the multitude for direction and dictation in all they
had to do察the able and aspiring for personal advancement。 To be
admitted into the ranks of this bureaucracy察and when admitted察to
rise therein察would be the sole objects of ambition。 Under this
regime察not only is the outside public ill´qualified察for want of
practical experience察to criticise or check the mode of operation of
the bureaucracy察but even if the accidents of despotic or the
natural working of popular institutions occasionally raise to the
summit a ruler or rulers of reforming inclinations察no reform can be
effected which is contrary to the interest of the bureaucracy。
Such is the melancholy condition of the Russian empire察as shown
in the accounts of those who have had sufficient opportunity of
observation。 The Czar himself is powerless against the bureaucratic
body察he can send any one of them to Siberia察but he cannot govern
without them察or against their will。 On every decree of his they
have a tacit veto察by merely refraining from carrying it into
effect。 In countries of more advanced civilisation and of a more
insurrectionary spirit察the public察accustomed to expect everything to
be done for them by the State察or at least to do nothing for
themselves without asking from the State not only leave to do it
but even how it is to be done察naturally hold the State responsible
for all evil which befalls them察and when the evil exceeds their
amount of patience察they rise against the government察and make what is
called a revolution察whereupon somebody else察with or without
legitimate authority from the nation察vaults into the seat察issues his
orders to the bureaucracy察and everything goes on much as it did
before察the bureaucracy being unchanged察and nobody else being capable
of taking their place。
A very different spectacle is exhibited among a people accustomed to
transact their own business。 In France察a large part of the people
having been engaged in military service察many of whom have held at
least the rank of non commissioned officers察there are in every
popular i