太子爷小说网 > 英语电子书 > journal of a voyage to lisbon >

第1节

journal of a voyage to lisbon-第1节

小说: journal of a voyage to lisbon 字数: 每页4000字

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!







Journal of A Voyage to Lisbon



by Henry Fielding












CONTENTS



INTRODUCTION TO SEVERAL WORKS

PREFACE 

DEDICATION TO THE PUBLIC 



INTRODUCTION TO THE VOYAGE TO LISBON

THE VOYAGE 







INTRODUCTION TO SEVERAL WORKS



When it was determined to extend the present edition of Fielding;

not merely by the addition of Jonathan Wild to the three

universally popular novels; but by two volumes of Miscellanies;

there could be no doubt about at least one of the contents of

these latter。   The Journal of a Voyage to Lisbon; if it does not

rank in my estimation anywhere near to Jonathan Wild as an

example of our author's genius; is an invaluable and delightful

document for his character and memory。  It is indeed; as has been

pointed out in the General Introduction to this series; our main

source of indisputable information as to Fielding dans son

naturel; and its value; so far as it goes; is of the very

highest。   The gentle and unaffected stoicism which the author

displays under a disease which he knew well was probably; if not

certainly; mortal; and which; whether mortal or not; must cause

him much actual pain and discomfort of a kind more intolerable

than pain itself; his affectionate care for his family; even

little personal touches; less admirable; but hardly less pleasant

than these; showing an Englishman's dislike to be 〃done〃 and an

Englishman's determination to be treated with proper respect; are

scarcely less noticeable and important on the biographical side

than the unimpaired brilliancy of his satiric and yet kindly

observation of life and character is on the side of literature。



There is; as is now well known since Mr。 Dobson's separate

edition of the Voyage; a little bibliographical problem about the

first appearance of this Journal in 1755。  The best known issue

of that year is much shorter than the version inserted by Murphy

and reprinted here; the passages omitted being chiefly those

reflecting on the captain; etc。; and so likely to seem invidious

in a book published just after the author's death; and for the

benefit; as was expressly announced; of his family。  But the

curious thing is that there is ANOTHER edition; of date so early

that some argument is necessary to determine the priority; which

does give these passages and is identical with the later or

standard version。  For satisfaction on this point; however; I

must refer readers to Mr。 Dobson himself。



There might have been a little; but not much; doubt as to a

companion piece for the Journal; for indeed; after we close this

(with or without its 〃Fragment on Bolingbroke〃); the remainder of

Fielding's work lies on a distinctly lower level of interest。  It

is still interesting; or it would not be given here。  It still

hasat least that part which here appears seems to its editor to

haveinterest intrinsic and 〃simple of itself。〃  But it is

impossible for anybody who speaks critically to deny that we now

get into the region where work is more interesting because of its

authorship than it would be if its authorship were different or

unknown。  To put the same thing in a sharper antithesis; Fielding

is interesting; first of all; because he is the author of Joseph

Andrews; of Tom Jones; of Amelia; of Jonathan Wild; of the

Journal。  His plays; his essays; his miscellanies generally are

interesting; first of all; because they were written by Fielding。



Yet of these works; the Journey from this World to the Next

(which; by a grim trick of fortune; might have served as a title

for the more interesting Voyage with which we have yoked it)

stands clearly first both in scale and merit。  It is indeed very

unequal; and as the author was to leave it unfinished; it is a

pity that he did not leave it unfinished much sooner than he

actually did。  The first ten chapters; if of a kind of satire

which has now grown rather obsolete for the nonce; are of a good

kind and good in their kind; the history of the metempsychoses of

Julian is of a less good kind; and less good in that kind。  The

date of composition of the piece is not known; but it appeared in

the Miscellanies of 1743; and may represent almost any period of

its author's development prior to that year。  Its form was a very

common form at the time; and continued to be so。  I do not know

that it is necessary to assign any very special origin to it;

though Lucian; its chief practitioner; was evidently and almost

avowedly a favorite study of Fielding's。  The Spanish romancers;

whether borrowing it from Lucian or not; had been fond of it;

their French followers; of whom the chief were Fontenelle and Le

Sage; had carried it northwards; the English essayists had almost

from the beginning continued the process of acclimatization。 

Fielding therefore found it ready to his hand; though the present

condition of this example would lead us to suppose that he did

not find his hand quite ready to it。  Still; in the actual

〃journey;〃 there are touches enough of the masternot yet quite

in his stage of mastery。  It seemed particularly desirable not to

close the series without some representation of the work to which

Fielding gave the prime of his manhood; and from which; had he

not; fortunately for English literature; been driven decidedly

against his will; we had had in all probability no Joseph

Andrews; and pretty certainly no Tom Jones。  Fielding's

periodical and dramatic work has been comparatively seldom

reprinted; and has never yet been reprinted as a whole。  The

dramas indeed are open to two objectionsthe first; that they

are not very 〃proper;〃 the second; and much more serious; that

they do not redeem this want of propriety by the possession of

any remarkable literary merit。  Three (or two and part of a

third) seemed to escape this double censurethe first two acts

of the Author's Farce (practically a piece to themselves; for the

Puppet Show which follows is almost entirely independent); the

famous burlesque of Tom Thumb; which stands between the Rehearsal

and the Critic; but nearer to the former; and Pasquin; the

maturest example of Fielding's satiric work in drama。  These

accordingly have been selected; the rest I have read; and he who

likes may read。  I have read many worse things than even the

worst of them; but not often worse things by so good a writer as

Henry Fielding。  The next question concerned the selection of

writings more miscellaneous still; so as to give in little a

complete idea of Fielding's various powers and experiments。  Two

difficulties beset this part of the taskwant of space and the

absence of anything so markedly good as absolutely to insist on

inclusion。  The Essay on Conversation; however; seemed pretty

peremptorily to challenge a place。  It is in a style which

Fielding was very slow to abandon; which indeed has left strong

traces even on his great novels; and if its mannerism is not now

very attractive; the separate traits in it are often sharp and

well…drawn。  The book would not have been complete without a

specimen or two of Fielding's journalism。  The Champion; his

first attempt of this kind; has not been drawn upon in

consequence of the extreme difficulty of fixing with absolute

certainty on Fielding's part in it。  I do not know whether

political prejudice interferes; more than I have usually found it

interfere; with my judgment of the two Hanoverian…partisan papers

of the '45 time。  But they certainly seem to me to fail in

redeeming their dose of rancor and misrepresentation by any

sufficient evidence of genius such as; to my taste; saves not

only the party journalism in verse and prose of Swift and Canning

and Praed on one side; but that of Wolcot and Moore and Sydney

Smith on the other。  Even the often…quoted journal of events in

London under the Chevalier is overwrought and tedious。  The best

thing in the True Patriot seems to me to be Parson Adams' letter

describing his adventure with a young 〃bowe〃 of his day; and this

I select; together with one or two numbers of the Covent Garden

Journal。  I have not found in this latter anything more

characteristic than Murphy's selection; though Mr。 Dobson; with

his unfailing kindness; lent me an original and unusually

complete set of the Journal itself。



It is to the same kindness that I owe the opportunity of

presenting the reader with something indisputably Fielding's and

very characteristic of him; which Murphy did not print; and which

has not; so far as I know; ever appeared either in a collection

or a selection of Fielding's work。  After the success of David

Simple; Fielding gave his sister; for whom he had already written

a preface to that novel; another preface for a set of Familiar

Letters between the characters of David Simple and others。  This

preface Murphy reprinted; but he either did not notice; or did

not choose to attend to; a note towards the end of the book

attributing certain of the 

返回目录 下一页 回到顶部 1 0

你可能喜欢的