history of philosophy-µÚ72½Ú
°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡
Wolffian¡¡philosophy¡¡¡¡¡for¡¡this¡¡it¡¡had¡¡not¡¡been¡¡possible¡¡to¡¡eradicate¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡it¡¡declared¡¡the¡¡same¡¡to
be¡¡harmless£»¡¡that¡¡is¡¡to¡¡say£»¡¡free¡¡from¡¡all¡¡danger¡¡to¡¡state¡¡and¡¡religion£»¡¡it¡¡also¡¡forbade¡¡the¡¡theologians
to¡¡make¡¡it¡¡a¡¡subject¡¡of¡¡dispute£»¡¡and¡¡altogether¡¡put¡¡an¡¡end¡¡to¡¡their¡¡clamour¡£¡¡Frederick¡¡William¡¡now
issued¡¡a¡¡recall¡¡in¡¡very¡¡respectful¡¡terms¡¡to¡¡Wolff£»¡¡who£»¡¡however£»¡¡hesitated¡¡to¡¡comply¡¡with¡¡it¡¡owing
to¡¡his¡¡lack¡¡of¡¡confidence¡¡in¡¡its¡¡sincerity¡£¡¡On¡¡the¡¡accession¡¡of¡¡Frederick¡¡II¡£¡¡in¡¡1740¡¡he¡¡was¡¡again
recalled¡¡in¡¡terms¡¡of¡¡the¡¡highest¡¡honour¡¡£¨Lange¡¡had¡¡meanwhile¡¡died£©£»¡¡and¡¡only¡¡then¡¡did¡¡be¡¡comply¡£
Wolff¡¡became¡¡Vice¡Chancellor¡¡of¡¡the¡¡University£»¡¡but¡¡he¡¡outlived¡¡his¡¡repute£»¡¡and¡¡his¡¡lectures¡¡at¡¡the
end¡¡were¡¡very¡¡poorly¡¡attended¡£¡¡He¡¡died¡¡in¡¡1754¡££¨1£©
Like¡¡Tschirnhausen¡¡and¡¡Thomasius£»¡¡Wolff¡¡wrote¡¡a¡¡great¡¡part¡¡of¡¡his¡¡works¡¡in¡¡his¡¡mother¡¡tongue£»
while¡¡Leibnitz¡¡for¡¡the¡¡most¡¡part¡¡wrote¡¡only¡¡in¡¡Latin¡¡or¡¡French¡£¡¡This¡¡is¡¡an¡¡important¡¡matter£»¡¡for£»¡¡as
we¡¡have¡¡already¡¡noticed¡¡£¨pp¡£¡¡114¡¡and¡¡150£©£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡only¡¡when¡¡a¡¡nation¡¡possesses¡¡a¡¡science¡¡in¡¡its¡¡own
language¡¡that¡¡it¡¡can¡¡really¡¡be¡¡said¡¡to¡¡belong¡¡to¡¡it£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡Philosophy¡¡most¡¡of¡¡all¡¡this¡¡is¡¡requisite¡£¡¡For
thought¡¡has¡¡in¡¡it¡¡this¡¡very¡¡moment¡¡of¡¡pertaining¡¡to¡¡self¡consciousness¡¡or¡¡of¡¡being¡¡absolutely¡¡its
own£»¡¡when¡¡one's¡¡own¡¡language¡¡is¡¡the¡¡vehicle¡¡of¡¡expression£»¡¡as¡¡when¡¡we¡¡talk¡¡of¡¡¡¨Bestimmtheit¡¨
instead¡¡of¡¡¡¨Determination£»¡¨¡¡and¡¡¡¨Wesen¡¨¡¡instead¡¡of¡¡¡¨Essenz£»¡¨¡¡it¡¡is¡¡immediately¡¡present¡¡to¡¡our
consciousness¡¡that¡¡the¡¡conceptions¡¡are¡¡absolutely¡¡its¡¡own£»¡¡it¡¡has¡¡to¡¡deal¡¡with¡¡these¡¡at¡¡all¡¡times£»¡¡and
they¡¡are¡¡in¡¡no¡¡way¡¡foreign¡¡to¡¡it¡£¡¡The¡¡Latin¡¡language¡¡has¡¡a¡¡phraseology£»¡¡a¡¡definite¡¡sphere¡¡and¡¡range
of¡¡conception£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡at¡¡once¡¡taken¡¡for¡¡granted¡¡that¡¡when¡¡men¡¡write¡¡in¡¡Latin¡¡they¡¡are¡¡at¡¡liberty¡¡to¡¡be
dull£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡impossible¡¡to¡¡read¡¡or¡¡write¡¡what¡¡men¡¡permit¡¡themselves¡¡to¡¡say¡¡in¡¡Latin¡£¡¡The¡¡titles¡¡of
Wolff's¡¡philosophic¡¡works¡¡are¡¡perpetually¡¡of¡¡this¡¡nature£º¡¡¡¨Rational¡¡thoughts¡¡on¡¡the¡¡powers¡¡of¡¡the
human¡¡understanding¡¡and¡¡their¡¡right¡¡uses¡¡in¡¡the¡¡knowledge¡¡of¡¡the¡¡truth£»¡¨¡¡Halle£»¡¡1712£»¡¡8vo£»
¡¨Rational¡¡thoughts¡¡on¡¡God£»¡¡the¡¡world£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡soul¡¡of¡¡man£»¡¡likewise¡¡on¡¡all¡¡things¡¡generally£»¡¨
Frankfort¡¡and¡¡Leipzig£»¡¡1719£»¡¡¡¨On¡¡the¡¡action¡¡and¡¡conduct¡¡of¡¡men£»¡¨¡¡Halle£»¡¡1720£»¡¡¡¨On¡¡Social¡¡Life£»¡¨
Halle£»¡¡1720£»¡¡¡¨On¡¡the¡¡operations¡¡of¡¡Nature£»¡¨¡¡Halle£»¡¡1723£»¡¡and¡¡so¡¡on¡£¡¡Wolff¡¡wrote¡¡German¡¡and
Latin¡¡quartos¡¡on¡¡every¡¡department¡¡of¡¡Philosophy£»¡¡even¡¡on¡¡economics¡¡¡¡¡twenty¡three¡¡thick
volumes¡¡of¡¡Latin£»¡¡or¡¡about¡¡forty¡¡quartos¡¡altogether¡£¡¡His¡¡mathematical¡¡works¡¡make¡¡a¡¡good¡¡many
more¡¡quartos¡£¡¡He¡¡brought¡¡into¡¡general¡¡use¡¡the¡¡differential¡¡and¡¡integral¡¡calculus¡¡of¡¡Leibnitz¡£
It¡¡is¡¡only¡¡in¡¡its¡¡general¡¡content¡¡and¡¡taken¡¡as¡¡a¡¡whole¡¡that¡¡Wolff's¡¡philosophy¡¡is¡¡the¡¡philosophy¡¡of
Leibnitz£»¡¡that¡¡is¡¡to¡¡say£»¡¡only¡¡in¡¡relation¡¡to¡¡the¡¡fundamental¡¡determinations¡¡of¡¡monads¡¡and¡¡to¡¡the
theodicy¡¡¡¡¡to¡¡these¡¡he¡¡remained¡¡faithful£»¡¡any¡¡other¡¡content¡¡is¡¡empiric£»¡¡derived¡¡from¡¡our¡¡feelings¡¡and
desires¡£¡¡Wolff¡¡likewise¡¡accepted¡¡in¡¡their¡¡entirety¡¡all¡¡the¡¡Cartesian¡¡and¡¡other¡¡definitions¡¡of¡¡general
ideas¡£¡¡Hence¡¡we¡¡find¡¡in¡¡him¡¡abstract¡¡propositions¡¡and¡¡their¡¡proofs¡¡mingled¡¡with¡¡experiences£»¡¡on
the¡¡indubitable¡¡truth¡¡of¡¡which¡¡he¡¡builds¡¡a¡¡large¡¡part¡¡of¡¡his¡¡propositions£»¡¡and¡¡he¡¡must¡¡so¡¡build¡¡and
derive¡¡his¡¡foundations¡¡if¡¡a¡¡content¡¡is¡¡to¡¡result¡¡at¡¡all¡£¡¡With¡¡Spinoza£»¡¡on¡¡the¡¡contrary£»¡¡no¡¡content¡¡is¡¡to
be¡¡found¡¡excepting¡¡absolute¡¡substance¡¡and¡¡a¡¡perpetual¡¡return¡¡into¡¡the¡¡same¡£¡¡The¡¡greatness¡¡of
Wolff's¡¡services¡¡to¡¡the¡¡culture¡¡of¡¡Germany£»¡¡which¡¡now£»¡¡appeared¡¡quite¡¡independently¡¡and¡¡without
any¡¡connection¡¡with¡¡an¡¡earlier¡¡and¡¡profounder¡¡metaphysical¡¡standpoint¡¡£¨supra£»¡¡p¡£¡¡350£©£»¡¡are¡¡in
proportion¡¡to¡¡the¡¡barrenness¡¡and¡¡inward¡¡contentless¡¡condition¡¡into¡¡which¡¡Philosophy¡¡had¡¡sunk¡£
This¡¡he¡¡divided¡¡into¡¡its¡¡formal¡¡disciplines£»¡¡spinning¡¡it¡¡out£»¡¡into¡¡determinations¡¡of¡¡the¡¡understanding
with¡¡a¡¡pedantic¡¡application¡¡of¡¡geometric¡¡methods£»¡¡and£»¡¡contemporaneously¡¡with¡¡the¡¡English
philosophers£»¡¡he¡¡made¡¡the¡¡dogmatism¡¡of¡¡the¡¡metaphysics¡¡of¡¡the¡¡understanding¡¡fashionable£»¡¡that¡¡is
a£»¡¡philosophizing¡¡which¡¡determines¡¡the¡¡absolute¡¡and¡¡rational¡¡by¡¡means¡¡of¡¡self¡exclusive
thought¡determinations¡¡and¡¡relationships¡¡£¨such¡¡as¡¡one¡¡and¡¡many£»¡¡simple¡¡and¡¡compound£»¡¡finite¡¡and
infinite£»¡¡causal¡¡connection£»¡¡&c¡££©¡£¡¡Wolff¡¡entirely¡¡displaced¡¡the¡¡Aristotelian¡¡philosophy¡¡of¡¡the
schools£»¡¡and¡¡made¡¡Philosophy¡¡into¡¡an¡¡ordinary¡¡science¡¡pertaining¡¡to¡¡the¡¡German¡¡nation¡£¡¡But
besides¡¡this¡¡he¡¡gave¡¡Philosophy¡¡that¡¡systematic¡¡and¡¡requisite¡¡division¡¡into¡¡sections¡¡which¡¡has¡¡down
to¡¡the¡¡present¡¡day¡¡served¡¡as¡¡a¡¡sort¡¡of¡¡standard¡£
In¡¡theoretic¡¡philosophy¡¡Wolff¡¡first¡¡treats¡¡of¡¡Logic¡¡purified¡¡from¡¡scholastic¡¡interpretations¡¡or
deductions£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡the¡¡logic¡¡of¡¡the¡¡understanding¡¡which¡¡he¡¡has¡¡systematized¡£¡¡The¡¡second¡¡stage¡¡is
Metaphysics£»¡¡which¡¡contains¡¡four¡¡parts£º¡¡first¡¡there¡¡is¡¡Ontology£»¡¡the¡¡treatment¡¡of¡¡abstract¡¡and¡¡quite
general¡¡philosophic¡¡categories£»¡¡such¡¡as¡¡Being¡¡and¡¡its¡¡being¡¡the¡¡One¡¡and¡¡Good£»¡¡in¡¡this¡¡abstract
metaphysic¡¡there¡¡further¡¡comes¡¡accident£»¡¡substance£»¡¡cause¡¡and¡¡effect£»¡¡the¡¡phenomenon£»¡¡&c¡£¡¡Next
in¡¡order¡¡is¡¡Cosmology£»¡¡a¡¡general¡¡doctrine¡¡of¡¡body£»¡¡the¡¡doctrine¡¡of¡¡the¡¡world£»¡¡here¡¡we¡¡have
abstract¡¡metaphysical¡¡propositions¡¡respecting¡¡the¡¡world£»¡¡that¡¡there¡¡is¡¡no¡¡chance£»¡¡no¡¡leaps¡¡or
bounds¡¡in¡¡nature¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡law¡¡of¡¡continuity¡£¡¡Wolff¡¡excludes¡¡natural¡¡science¡¡and¡¡natural¡¡history¡£¡¡The
third¡¡part¡¡of¡¡the¡¡metaphysic¡¡is¡¡rational¡¡psychology¡¡or¡¡pneumatology£»¡¡the¡¡philosophy¡¡of¡¡the¡¡soul£»
which¡¡deals¡¡with¡¡the¡¡simplicity£»¡¡immortality£»¡¡immateriality¡¡of¡¡the¡¡soul¡£¡¡Finally£»¡¡the¡¡fourth¡¡is¡¡natural
theology£»¡¡which¡¡sets¡¡forth¡¡the¡¡proofs¡¡of¡¡the¡¡existence¡¡of¡¡God¡££¨2£©¡¡Wolff¡¡also¡¡inserts¡¡£¨chap¡£¡¡iii¡££©¡¡an
empirical¡¡psychology¡£¡¡Practical¡¡philosophy¡¡he¡¡divides¡¡into¡¡the¡¡Rights¡¡of¡¡Nature£»¡¡Morality£»¡¡the
Rights¡¡of¡¡Nations¡¡or¡¡Politics£»¡¡and¡¡Economics¡£
The¡¡whole¡¡is¡¡propounded¡¡in¡¡geometric¡¡forms¡¡such¡¡as¡¡definitions£»¡¡axioms£»¡¡theorems£»¡¡scholia£»
corollaries£»¡¡&c¡£¡¡In¡¡mathematics¡¡the¡¡understanding¡¡is¡¡in¡¡its¡¡proper¡¡place£»¡¡for¡¡the¡¡triangle¡¡must
remain¡¡the¡¡triangle¡£¡¡Wolff¡¡on¡¡the¡¡one¡¡hand¡¡started¡¡upon¡¡a¡¡large¡¡range¡¡of¡¡investigation£»¡¡and¡¡one
quite¡¡indefinite¡¡in¡¡character£»¡¡and¡¡on¡¡the¡¡other£»¡¡held¡¡to¡¡a¡¡strictly¡¡methodical¡¡manner¡¡with¡¡regard¡¡to
propositions¡¡and¡¡their¡¡proofs¡£¡¡The¡¡method¡¡is¡¡really¡¡similar¡¡to¡¡that¡¡of¡¡Spinoza£»¡¡only¡¡it¡¡is¡¡more
wooden¡¡and¡¡lifeless¡¡than¡¡his¡£¡¡Wolff¡¡applied¡¡the¡¡same¡¡methods¡¡to¡¡every¡¡sort¡¡of¡¡content¡¡¡¡¡even¡¡to
that¡¡which¡¡is¡¡altogether¡¡empirical£»¡¡such¡¡as¡¡his¡¡so¡called¡¡applied¡¡mathematics£»¡¡into¡¡which¡¡he
introduces¡¡many¡¡useful¡¡arts£»¡¡bringing¡¡the¡¡most¡¡ordinary¡¡reflections¡¡and¡¡directions¡¡into¡¡the¡¡geometric
form¡£¡¡In¡¡many¡¡cases¡¡this¡¡undoubtedly¡¡gives¡¡his¡¡work¡¡a¡¡most¡¡pedantic¡¡aspect£»¡¡especially¡¡when¡¡the
content¡¡directly¡¡justifies¡¡itself¡¡to¡¡our¡¡conception¡¡without¡¡this¡¡form¡¡at¡¡all¡£¡¡For¡¡Wolff¡¡proceeds¡¡by¡¡first
laying¡¡down¡¡certain¡¡definitions£»¡¡which¡¡really¡¡rest¡¡upon¡¡our¡¡ordinary¡¡conceptions£»¡¡since¡¡these¡¡he
translated¡¡into¡¡the¡¡empty¡¡form¡¡of¡¡determinations¡¡of¡¡the¡¡understanding¡£¡¡Hence¡¡the¡¡definitions¡¡are
merely¡¡nominal¡¡definitions£»¡¡and¡¡we¡¡know¡¡whether¡¡they¡¡are¡¡correct¡¡only¡¡by¡¡seeing¡¡whether¡¡they
correspond¡¡to¡¡conceptions¡¡which¡¡are¡¡referred¡¡to¡¡their¡¡simple¡¡thoughts¡£¡¡The¡¡syllogism¡¡is¡¡the¡¡form¡¡of
real¡¡importance¡¡in¡¡this¡¡mode¡¡of¡¡reasoning£»¡¡and¡¡with¡¡Wolff¡¡it¡¡often¡¡attains¡¡to¡¡its¡¡extreme¡¡of¡¡rigidity
and¡¡formalism¡£
Under¡¡mathematics£»¡¡which¡¡is¡¡the¡¡subject¡¡of¡¡four¡¡small¡¡volumes£»¡¡Wolff¡¡also¡¡treats¡¡of¡¡architecture
and¡¡military¡¡science¡£¡¡One¡¡of¡¡the¡¡propositions¡¡in¡¡Architecture¡¡is¡¡this£º¡¡¡¨Windows¡¡must¡¡be¡¡wide
enough¡¡for¡¡two¡¡persons¡£¡¨¡¡The¡¡making¡¡of¡¡a¡¡door¡¡is¡¡also¡¡propounded¡¡as¡¡a¡¡task£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡solution
thereof¡¡given¡£¡¡The¡¡next¡¡best¡¡example¡¡comes¡¡from¡¡the¡¡art¡¡of¡¡warfare¡£¡¡The¡¡¡¨Fourth¡¡proposition¡£¡¡The
approach¡¡to¡¡the¡¡fortress¡¡must¡¡always¡¡be¡¡harder¡¡for¡¡the¡¡enemy¡¡the¡¡nearer¡¡he¡¡comes¡¡to¡¡it¡£¡¨¡¡Instead
of¡¡saying¡¡because¡¡the¡¡danger¡¡is¡¡greater£»¡¡which¡¡would¡¡be¡¡trivial£»¡¡there¡¡follows¡¡the¡¡¡¨Proof¡£¡¡The
nearer¡¡the¡¡enemy¡¡comes¡¡to¡¡the¡¡fortress£»¡¡the¡¡greater¡¡the¡¡danger¡£¡¡But¡¡the¡¡greater¡¡the¡¡danger¡¡the
greater¡¡the¡¡resistance¡¡that¡¡must¡¡be¡¡offered¡¡in¡¡order¡¡to¡¡defy¡¡the¡¡attacks£»¡¡and£»¡¡so¡¡far¡¡as¡¡may¡¡be£»
avert¡¡the¡¡danger¡£¡¡Hence¡¡the¡¡nearer¡¡the¡¡enemy¡¡is¡¡to¡¡the¡¡fort¡¡the¡¡harder¡¡must¡¡the¡¡approach¡¡be¡¡made
for¡¡him¡£¡¡Q¡£E¡£D¡£¡¨£¨3£©¡¡Since¡¡the¡¡increase¡¡of¡¡the¡¡danger¡¡is¡¡given¡¡as¡¡the¡¡reason£»¡¡the¡¡whole¡¡is¡¡false£»¡¡and
the¡¡contrary¡¡may¡¡be¡¡said¡¡with¡¡equal¡¡truth¡£¡¡For¡¡if¡¡at¡¡the¡¡beginning¡¡all¡¡possible¡¡resistance¡¡is¡¡offered
to¡¡the¡¡enemy£»¡¡he¡¡cannot¡¡get¡¡nearer¡¡the¡¡fortress¡¡at¡¡all£»¡¡and¡¡thus¡¡the¡¡danger¡¡cannot¡¡become¡¡greater¡£
The¡¡greater¡¡resistance¡¡has¡¡a¡¡real¡¡cause£»¡¡and¡¡not¡¡this¡¡foolish¡¡one¡¡¡¡¡namely£»¡¡that¡¡because¡¡the¡¡garrison
is¡¡now¡¡at¡¡closer¡¡quarters£»¡¡and¡¡consequently¡¡operates¡¡in¡¡a¡¡narrow¡¡field£»¡¡it¡¡can¡¡offer¡¡a¡¡greater
resistance¡£¡¡In¡¡this¡¡most¡¡trivial¡¡way¡¡Wolff¡¡proceeds¡¡with¡¡every¡¡sort¡¡of¡¡content¡£¡¡This¡¡barbarism¡¡of
pedantry£»¡¡or¡¡this¡¡pedantry¡¡of¡¡barbarism£»¡¡represented¡¡as¡¡it¡¡is¡¡in¡¡its¡¡whole¡¡breadth¡¡and¡¡extent£»
necessarily¡¡brought¡¡itself¡¡into¡¡disrepute£»¡¡and¡¡without¡¡there¡¡being¡¡a¡¡definite¡¡consciousness¡¡of¡¡the
reason¡¡why¡¡the¡¡geometric¡¡method¡¡is¡¡not¡¡the¡¡only¡¡and¡¡ultimate¡¡method¡¡of¡¡knowledge£»¡¡instinct¡¡and
an¡¡immediate¡¡consciousness¡¡of¡¡the¡¡foolishness¡¡of¡¡its¡¡applications¡¡caused¡¡this¡¡method¡¡to¡¡be¡¡set
aside¡£
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡C¡¡3¡£¡¡THE¡¡POPULAR¡¡PHILOSOPHY¡¡OF
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡GERMANY¡£
Popular¡¡philosophy¡¡flatters¡¡our¡¡ordinary¡¡consciousness£»¡¡makes¡¡it¡¡the¡¡ultimate¡¡standard¡£¡¡Although
with¡¡Spinoza¡¡we¡¡begin