lect03-第6节
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
probable that it was occasionally; and even often true of the
smaller group; the Sept; sub…Tribe; or Joint Family; which
appears to me to be the legal unit of the Brehon tracts。 The
traditions regarding the eponymous ancestor of this group were
distinct and apparently trustworthy; and its members were of kin
to one another in virtue of their common descent from the
ancestor who gave his name to all。 The chief for the time being
was; as the Anglo…Irish judges called him in the famous 'Case of
Gavelkind;' the caput cognationis。
Not only was the Tribe or Sept named after this eponymous
ancestor; but the territory which it occupied also derived from
him the name which was in commonest use。 I make this remark
chiefly because a false inference has been drawn from an
assertion of learned men concerning the connection between names
of families and names of places; which properly understood is
perfectly sound。 It has been laid down that; whenever a family
and place have the same name; it is the place which almost
certainly gave its name to the family。 This is no doubt true of
feudalised countries; but it is not true of countries as yet
unaffected by feudalism。 It is likely that such names as
'O'Brien's Country' and 'Macleod's Country' are as old as any
appropriation of land by man; and this is worth remembering when
we are tempted to gauge the intelligence of an early writer by
the absurdity of his etymologies。 'Hibernia' from an eponymous
discoverer; 'Hyber;' sounds ridiculous enough; but the chronicler
who gives it may have been near enough the age of tribal society
to think that the connection between the place and the name was
the most natural and probable he could suggest。 Even the most
fanciful etymologies of the Greeks; such as Hellespont; from
Helle; may have been 'survivals' from a primitive tribal system
of naming places。 In the relation between names and places; as in
much more important matters; feudalism has singularly added to
the importance of land。
Let me now state the impression which; partly from the
examination of the translated texts; legal and non…legal; and
partly by the aid of Dr。 Sullivan's Introduction; I have formed
of the agrarian organisation of an Irish Tribe。 It has been long
settled; in all probability; upon the tribal territory。 It is of
sufficient size and importance to constitute a political unit;
and possibly at its apex is one of the numerous chieftains whom
the Irish records call Kings。 The primary assumption is that the
whole of the tribal territory belongs to the whole of the tribe;
but in fact large portions of it have been permanently
appropriated to minor bodies of tribesmen。 A part is allotted in
a special way to the Chief as appurtenant to his office; and
depends from Chief to Chief according to a special rule of
succession。 Other portions are occupied by fragments of the
tribe; some of which are under minor chiefs or 'flaiths;' while
others; though not strictly ruled by a chief; have somebody of a
noble class to act as their representative。 All the
unappropriated tribe…lands are in a more especial way the
property of the tribe as a whole; and no portion can
theoretically be subjected to more than a temporary occupation。
Such occupations are; however; frequent; and among the holders of
tribe…land; on these terms; are groups of men calling themselves
tribesmen; but being in reality associations formed by contract;
chiefly for the purpose of pasturing cattle。 Much of the common
tribe…land is not occupied at all; but constitutes; to use the
English expression; the 'waste' of the tribe。 Still this waste is
constantly brought under tillage or permanent pasture by
settlements of tribesmen; and upon it cultivators of servile
status are permitted to squat; particularly towards the border。
It is the part of the territory over which the authority of the
Chief tends steadily to increase; and here it is that he settles
his 'fuidhir;' or stranger…tenants; a very important class the
outlaws and 'broken' men from other tribes who come to him for
protection; and who are only connected with their new tribe by
their dependence on its chief; and through the responsibility
which he incurs for them。
There is probably great uniformity in the composition of the
various groups occupying; permanently or temporary; the tribal
territory。 Each seems to be more or less a miniature of the large
tribe which includes them all。 Each probably contains freemen and
slaves; or at all events men varying materially in personal
status; yet each calls itself in some sense a family。 Each very
possibly has its appropriated land and its waste; and conducts
tillage and grazing on the same principles。 Each is either under
a Chief who really represents the common ancestor of all the free
kinsmen; or under somebody who has undertaken the
responsibilities devolving according to primitive social idea
upon the natural head of the kindred。 In enquiries of the class
upon which we are engaged the important fact which I stated here
three years ago should always be borne in mind。 When the first
English emigrants settled in New England they distributed
themselves in village communities; so difficult is it to strike
out new paths of social life and new routes of social habit。 It
is all but certain that; in such a society as that of which we
are speaking; one single model of social organisation and social
practice would prevail; and none but slight or insensible
departures from it would be practicable or conceivable。
But still the society thus formed is not altogether
stationary。 The temporary occupation of the common tribe…land
tends to become permanent; either through the tacit sufferance or
the active consent of the tribesmen。 Particular families manage
to elude the theoretically periodical re…division of the common
patrimony of the group; others obtain allotments with its consent
as the reward of service or the appanage of office; and there is
a constant transfer of lands to the Church; and an intimate
intermixture of tribal rights with ecclesiastical rights。 The
establishment of Property in Severalty is doubtless retarded both
by the abundance of land and by the very law under which; to
repeat the metaphor of the Indian poetess; the tribal society has
crystallised; since each family which has appropriated a portion
of tribe…land tends always to expand into an extensive assemblage
of tribesmen having equal rights。 But still there is a
co…operation of causes always tending to result in Several
Property; and the Brehon law shows that by the time it was put
into shape they had largely taken effect。 As might be expected;
the severance of land from the common territory appears to have
been most complete in the case of Chiefs; many of whom have large
private estates held under ordinary tenure in addition to the
demesne specially attached to their signory。
Such is the picture of Irish tribal organisation in relation
to the land which I have been able to present to my own mind。 All
such descriptions must be received with reserve: among other
reasons; because even the evidence obtainable from the law…tracts
is still incomplete。 But if the account is in any degree correct;
all who have attended to this class of subjects will observe at
once that the elements of what we are accustomed to consider the
specially Germanic land system are present in the territorial
arrangements of the Irish tribe。 Doubtless there are material
distinctions。 Kinship as yet; rather than landed right; knits the
members of the Irish groups together。 The Chief is as yet a very
different personage from the Lord of the Manor。 And there are no
signs as yet even of the beginnings of gre