medical essays-第15节
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
It is stated by Dr。 Leo…Wolf； that Professor Joerg； of Leipsic； has proved many of Hahnemann's quotations from old authors to be adulterate and false。 What particular instances he has pointed out I have no means of learning。 And it is probably wholly impossible on this side of the Atlantic； and even in most of the public libraries of Europe； to find anything more than a small fraction of the innumerable obscure publications which the neglect of grocers and trunkmakers has spared to be ransacked by the all…devouring genius of Homoeopathy。 I have endeavored to verify such passages as my own library afforded me the means of doing。 For some I have looked in vain； for want； as I am willing to believe； of more exact references。 But this I am able to affirm； that； out of the very small number which I have been able； to trace back to their original authors； I have found two to be wrongly quoted； one of them being a gross misrepresentation。
The first is from the ancient Roman author； Caelius Aurelianus； the second from the venerable folio of Forestus。 Hahnemann uses the following expressions；if he is not misrepresented in the English Translation of the 〃Organon 〃： 〃Asclepiades on one occasion cured an inflammation of the brain by administering a small quantity of wine。〃 After correcting the erroneous reference of the Translator； I can find no such case alluded to in the chapter。 But Caelius Aurelianus mentions two modes of treatment employed by Asclepiades； into both of which the use of wine entered； as being in the highest degree irrational and dangerous。〃 ＇Caelius Aurel。 De Morb。 Acut。 et Chron。 lib。 I。 cap。 xv。 not xvi。 Amsterdam。 Wetstein； 1755。＇
In speaking of the oil of anise…seed； Hahnemann says that Forestus observed violent colic caused by its administration。 But； as the author tells the story； a young man took； by the counsel of a surgeon； an acrid and virulent medicine； the name of which is not given； which brought on a most cruel fit of the gripes and colic。 After this another surgeon was called； who gave him oil of anise…seed and wine； which increased his suffering。〃 ＇Observ。 et Curat。 Med。 lib。 XXZ obs。 xiii。 Frankfort； 1614。＇ Now if this was the Homoeopathic remedy； as Hahnemann pretends； it might be a fair question why the young man was not cured by it。 But it is a much graver question why a man who has shrewdness and learning enough to go so far after his facts； should think it right to treat them with such astonishing negligence or such artful unfairness。
Even if every word he had pretended to take from his old authorities were to be found in them； even if the authority of every one of these authors were beyond question； the looseness with which they are used to prove whatever Hahnemann chooses is beyond the bounds of credibility。 Let me give one instance to illustrate the character of this man's mind。 Hahnemann asserts； in a note annexed to the 110th paragraph of the 〃Organon；〃 that the smell of the rose will cause certain persons to faint。 And he says in the text that substances which produce peculiar effects of this nature on particular constitutions cure the same symptoms in people in general。 Then in another note to the same paragraph he quotes the following fact from one of the last sources one would have looked to for medical information； the Byzantine Historians。
〃It was by these means〃 （i。e。 Homoeopathically） that the Princess Eudosia with rose…water restored a person who had fainted！〃
Is it possible that a man who is guilty of such pedantic folly as this；a man who can see a confirmation of his doctrine in such a recovery as this；a recovery which is happening every day； from a breath of air； a drop or two of water； untying a bonnet…string； loosening a stay…lace； and which can hardly help happening； whatever is done；is it possible that a man； of whose pages； not here and there one； but hundreds upon hundreds are loaded with such trivialities； is the Newton； the Columbus； the Harvey of the nineteenth century！
The whole process of demonstration he employs is this。 An experiment is instituted with some drug upon one or more healthy persons。 Everything that happens for a number of days or weeks is； as we have seen； set down as an effect of the medicine。 Old volumes are then ransacked promiscuously； and every morbid sensation or change that anybody ever said was produced by the drug in question is added to the list of symptoms。 By one or both of these methods； each of the sixty…four substances enumerated by Hahnemann is shown to produce a very large number of symptoms； the lowest in his scale being ninety… seven； and the highest fourteen hundred and ninety…one。 And having made out this list respecting any drug； a catalogue which； as you may observe in any Homoeopathic manual； contains various symptoms belonging to every organ of the body； what can be easier than to find alleged cures in every medical author which can at once be attributed to the Homoeopathic principle； still more if the grave of extinguished credulity is called upon to give up its dead bones as living witnesses； and worst of all； if the monuments of the past are to be mutilated in favor of 〃the sole law of Nature in therapeutics〃？
There are a few familiar facts of which great use has been made as an entering wedge for the Homoeopathic doctrine。 They have been suffered to pass current so long that it is time they should be nailed to the counter； a little operation which I undertake； with perfect cheerfulness； to perform for them。
The first is a supposed illustration of the Homoeopathic law found in the precept given for the treatment of parts which have been frozen； by friction with snow or similar means。 But we deceive ourselves by names； if we suppose the frozen part to be treated by cold； and not by heat。 The snow may even be actually warmer than the part to which it is applied。 But even if it were at the same temperature when applied； it never did and never could do the least good to a frozen part； except as a mode of regulating the application of what？ of heat。 But the heat must be applied gradually； just as food must be given a little at a time to those perishing with hunger。 If the patient were brought into a warm room； heat would be applied very rapidly； were not something interposed to prevent this； and allow its gradual admission。 Snow or iced water is exactly what is wanted； it is not cold to the part； it is very possibly warm； on the contrary； for these terms are relative； and if it does not melt and let the heat in； or is not taken away； the part will remain frozen up until doomsday。 Now the treatment of a frozen limb by heat； in large or small quantities； is not Homoeopathy。
The next supposed illustration of the Homoeopathic law is the alleged successful management of burns； by holding them to the fire。 This is a popular mode of treating those burns which are of too little consequence to require any more efficacious remedy； and would inevitably get well of themselves； without any trouble being bestowed upon them。 It produces a most acute pain in the part； which is followed by some loss of sensibility； as happens with the eye after exposure to strong light； and the ear after being subjected to very intense sounds。 This is all it is capable of doing； and all further notions of its efficacy must be attributed merely to the vulgar love of paradox。 If this example affords any comfort to the Homoeopathist； it seems as cruel to deprive him of it as it would be to convince the mistress of the smoke…jack or the flatiron that the fire does not literally 〃draw the fire out；〃 which is her hypothesis。
But if it were true that frost…bites were cured by cold and burns by heat； it would be subversive； so far as it went； of the great principle of Homoeopathy。
For you will remember that this principle is that Like cures Like； and not that Same cures Same； that there is resemblance and not identity between the symptoms of the disease and those produced by the drug which cures it； and none have been readier to insist upon this distinction than the Homoeopathists themselves。 For if Same cures Same； then every poison must be its own antidote；which is neither a part of their theory nor their so…called experience。 They have been asked often enough； why it was that arsenic could not cure the mischief which arsenic had caused； and why the infectious cause of small…pox did not remedy the disease it had produced； and then the； were ready enough to see the distinction I have pointed out。 O no！ it was not the hair of the same dog； but only of one very much like him！
A third instance in proof of the Homoeopathic law is sought for in the acknowledged efficacy of vaccination。 And how does the law apply to this？ It is granted by the advocates of Homoeopathy that there is a resemblance between the effects of the vaccine virus on a person in health and the symptoms of small…pox。 Therefore； according to the rule； the vaccine virus will cure the small…pox； which； as everybody knows； is entirely untrue。 But it prevents small…pox； say the Homoeopathists。 Yes； and so does small…pox prevent itself from ever happening again； and we know just as much of the principle involved in the one case as in the
